Arvind Kejriwal has been ordered to stay in jail until April 15 because of a case related to the liquor policy.

Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal has been placed in judicial custody until April 15 following his arrest by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) in connection with corruption allegations tied to the city's liquor policy. This decision comes just weeks before India gears up for Lok Sabha elections. Kejriwal was brought before Special Judge Kaveri Baweja after the conclusion of his ED custody, with the agency requesting a 15-day extension of judicial custody, citing potential future requirements for further custody. Additional Solicitor General S. V. Raju, representing the ED, highlighted Kejriwal's alleged lack of cooperation during custody, accusing him of being evasive and withholding passwords to electronic devices.

In response to his arrest, Kejriwal criticized the actions of the Prime Minister, expressing his belief that they were detrimental to the country. Present in court were AAP ministers Atishi, Saurabh Bhardwaj, and Kejriwal's wife, Sunita Kejriwal. Additionally, the Delhi High Court rejected a petition seeking to prevent Kejriwal from issuing orders while in ED custody for the money laundering case. Instead, it instructed the central agency to present its concerns to the special judge overseeing the excise policy case, empowering the judge to make appropriate decisions within the framework of the law.

The sequence of events underscores the ongoing legal and political tension surrounding Kejriwal and his administration. Allegations of corruption linked to the liquor policy have thrust Kejriwal and the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) into the spotlight, particularly as the country prepares for elections. The ED's assertion of Kejriwal's non-cooperation and evasion during custody further intensifies scrutiny on the chief minister and raises questions about the transparency and integrity of his leadership.

Kejriwal's critique of the Prime Minister's actions hints at the political dimension of his arrest and its potential implications for the broader political landscape. His supporters may interpret the arrest as politically motivated, aimed at undermining his influence and credibility ahead of crucial elections. Conversely, critics may view it as a necessary step in upholding accountability and combating corruption within the government.

The presence of AAP ministers and Kejriwal's wife in court signifies the collective support within his inner circle amid legal challenges. Their solidarity suggests a unified front against perceived injustices and attempts to maintain public confidence in Kejriwal's leadership.

The Delhi High Court's decision not to intervene directly in Kejriwal's ability to issue orders while in custody reflects a commitment to due process and legal procedures. By deferring to the special judge overseeing the excise policy case, the court reaffirms the independence and authority of the judiciary in adjudicating legal matters impartially.

Overall, the developments surrounding Arvind Kejriwal's arrest and subsequent judicial custody underscore the complex intersection of law, politics, and governance in contemporary India. The outcome of these legal proceedings will not only impact Kejriwal's political future but also shape public perceptions of accountability and transparency in governance.